•twitter15877
XX / Twitter166
◈Bluesky60
YHacker News58
r/Reddit11
@Mastodon6
project rollup
Default
16178
mentions
across 19 keywords
across 19 keywords
net sentiment
+24%
5105 positive
9895 neutral
1178 negative
volume & sentiment over time
May 13 – Oct 14, 2026 · 4-day buckets
sources
most discussed
claude / pricing
active days
68
mentions
Showing 876–900 of 1178 mentions
-
does cold calling work for AI agencies? yes. but I get it, it sucks what I've seen work: - block it on your calendar every morning - 100 dials a day. turn your brain off - do it in a group with your mates and gamify it - keep testing the script it builds your pipeline while you're still getting your first results does cold calling work for AI agencies? yes. but I get it, it sucks what I've seen work: - block it on your calendar every morning - 100 dials a day. turn your brain off - do it in a group with your mates and gamify it - keep testing the script it builds your pipeline while you're still getting your first resultsview source ↗
-
while everyone was busy making bizarre AI characters, this creator found a MUCH bigger angle. he made poor person look filthy RICH. 😭 and this guy looks 100% real, crazy part is that - he grew this account to 280K+ followers in just 2 days posting multiple times a day. these videos are EXPLODING right now becau… while everyone was busy making bizarre AI characters, this creator found a MUCH bigger angle. he made poor person look filthy RICH. 😭 and this guy looks 100% real, crazy part is that - he grew this account to 280K+ followers in just 2 days posting multiple times a day. these videos are EXPLODING right now because they immediately catch the attention. and these videos are soo simple to make. here is the step by step workflow: STEP 1: find an interesting character reference on Pinterest and use it as inspiration to create your own original character. then attach the reference to ChatGPT and ask: "create a realistic character sheet for an original character inspired by this reference. use 3 panels against a clean studio background: full-body front view with no head visible, full-body back view with the head visible, and a close-up shot of the face." STEP 2: find a viral luxury or rich lifestyle video, then swap your character into it with Higgsfield Genjutsu. use this prompt: "replace the person in @ video1 with the character from @ image1. keep the same motion, camera movement, lighting, framing, color grading, environment, and overall video quality." this prompt makes it look 100% real. DONE. this is it.view source ↗
-
I wanna take today off. But we all know what happens when you don’t post on X for a day 😭 I wanna take today off. But we all know what happens when you don’t post on X for a day 😭view source ↗
-
Don’t get me wrong, Cursor is one of the most stable harnesses I’ve used, and it’s excellent for coding and PRs. My issue is that my use is much broader. Take Fable, for example: it can do everything, but inside Cursor it feels heavily pushed toward coding, while creativity, reasoning, and planning drop significantly.… Don’t get me wrong, Cursor is one of the most stable harnesses I’ve used, and it’s excellent for coding and PRs. My issue is that my use is much broader. Take Fable, for example: it can do everything, but inside Cursor it feels heavily pushed toward coding, while creativity, reasoning, and planning drop significantly. In Droid, Devin, or Hermes, the same model feels much more capable across different types of work. I also see Cursor agents confidently mark tasks complete when they still have obvious issues, even with Fable. I run into this far less with Devin, Droid, or Hermes.view source ↗
-
Roast of Frontend Developers by Madhur Virli And, as an ex-frontend guy (pre ai), he's right 😭 https://t.co/71lsEIN0P6 Roast of Frontend Developers by Madhur Virli And, as an ex-frontend guy (pre ai), he's right 😭 https://t.co/71lsEIN0P6view source ↗
-
Drop your SaaS + pricing page 👇 I’ll rate your pricing 0–10. Too cheap? Too expensive? Just right? Drop your SaaS + pricing page 👇 I’ll rate your pricing 0–10. Too cheap? Too expensive? Just right?view source ↗
-
Arranged marriage is a scam. My friend (31, 5’ 9”, decent looking) works in Swiggy, makes 3L/mo in B’lore is getting rejected left-right-center from girls making 50k/mo since last 2 years. Date-to-marry. https://t.co/eYwrpZ6gnv Arranged marriage is a scam. My friend (31, 5’ 9”, decent looking) works in Swiggy, makes 3L/mo in B’lore is getting rejected left-right-center from girls making 50k/mo since last 2 years. Date-to-marry. https://t.co/eYwrpZ6gnvview source ↗
-
A genuine question: Why are we only vibe coding simple web apps? Why don't we vibe code Kubernetes, operating systems, compilers, databases, and other complex software? Is AI really not good enough to build all of these? A genuine question: Why are we only vibe coding simple web apps? Why don't we vibe code Kubernetes, operating systems, compilers, databases, and other complex software? Is AI really not good enough to build all of these?view source ↗
-
Most founders waste $30k/month looking for a unicorn. The worst thing you can do is hire one person to run organic growth. They don't exist. You need 3 completely different skill sets: 1. Head of Social Growth Gen Z brain rot expert. Watches viral content all day. Knows which principles actually apply to your app. … Most founders waste $30k/month looking for a unicorn. The worst thing you can do is hire one person to run organic growth. They don't exist. You need 3 completely different skill sets: 1. Head of Social Growth Gen Z brain rot expert. Watches viral content all day. Knows which principles actually apply to your app. 2. Creator Manager/Coach Gives feedback to every creative. Makes micro adjustments to hooks, storylines, CTAs. Without this, TikTok feels like a lottery. 3. Talent Scout Outreach to thousands of creators. Builds recruiting pipelines. Extreme volume plus systems mindset. These skill sets have zero overlap, yet founders keep hunting for the magical person who does all three - or they blow budget on agencies that promise everything. You can't shortcut this. Each role is full-time.view source ↗
-
You can now chart Workers Observability data in Custom Dashboards. Correlate Worker errors, logs, and HTTP traffic in one view to debug faster. https://t.co/ntJ1lHRKZl You can now chart Workers Observability data in Custom Dashboards. Correlate Worker errors, logs, and HTTP traffic in one view to debug faster. https://t.co/ntJ1lHRKZlview source ↗
-
AI monitoring is getting f…cking illegal 10 open-source GitHub projects for splitting one job across an entire team of AI workers 01 LangGraph ▸ https://t.co/40xDVIgL8I → stateful parallel agent workflows 02 CrewAI ▸ https://t.co/leSFAquLAW → specialized agents working as a crew BUILD THE WORKERS 03 AutoGen ▸ http… AI monitoring is getting f…cking illegal 10 open-source GitHub projects for splitting one job across an entire team of AI workers 01 LangGraph ▸ https://t.co/40xDVIgL8I → stateful parallel agent workflows 02 CrewAI ▸ https://t.co/leSFAquLAW → specialized agents working as a crew BUILD THE WORKERS 03 AutoGen ▸ https://t.co/QmDi0xGJNz → multi-agent conversations + execution 04 Agno ▸ https://t.co/K6IwXiJCKg → agent teams + workflows 05 OpenHands ▸ https://t.co/RLP18B0zIc → autonomous software tasks GIVE THEM A RUNTIME 06 E2B ▸ https://t.co/Mz2wXEtI9B → isolated environments for agent execution 07 Daytona ▸ https://t.co/pHtMWe7dsY → infrastructure for parallel AI workloads CONTROL THE QUEUE 08 Temporal ▸ https://t.co/5H7Tc3kwzS → durable workflows that survive failures VERIFY THE WORK 09 DeepEval ▸ https://t.co/c2kul9WwBD → evaluate agent outputs 10 Langfuse ▸ https://t.co/HqjNuZo4I1 → trace every task across the workflow the foundry: task → queue → ingest → reason → execute → verify → output → next task 3 workers can reason 5 can execute another can verify everything before it ships that’s the interesting shift the next AI system isn’t one agent processing prompts faster it’s a factory where tasks keep moving even when individual workers fail ⭣view source ↗
-
[PERSONAL BRAND COURSE: LESSON 1/10] The last mile problem, and exactly how to fix it Most experts don't have a content problem. They have a last mile problem. You know your stuff. The last mile is getting what's in your head in front of the people who can buy from you. Here's the system I'd run to close that gap, … [PERSONAL BRAND COURSE: LESSON 1/10] The last mile problem, and exactly how to fix it Most experts don't have a content problem. They have a last mile problem. You know your stuff. The last mile is getting what's in your head in front of the people who can buy from you. Here's the system I'd run to close that gap, step by step. 1. Stop trying to think of ideas Your best content already exists. It's in your sales calls, client calls, and the answers you give over and over. Record your calls. Pull out every question a prospect asks and every time you explain something with conviction. That's your content bank. 2. Do one interview a month Have someone ask you questions for an hour. Push back on your answers. Ask "why" until you get to the real opinion. One hour of talking gives you more usable material than a week of staring at a blank page. 3. Write for the buyer, not the algorithm Before you post, name the one person you want to read it. If they couldn't buy from you, wouldn't care, and will never talk to you, their likes don't matter. 4. Exclude as much as you include Content should repel the wrong people as much as it attracts the right ones. If everyone agrees with a post, it isn't saying anything. 5. Turn every answer into 3 formats One insight becomes: > a short text post > a graphic or screenshot > a short video of you saying it Same idea. Three ways in. 6. Post daily Daily is the entry fee. It's not the strategy. I've posted every day for 5+ years. My first 7 months on X: 8,000 followers and $0. Today it's 500k+ audience and $6M+ from my personal brand. The reps came first. The money followed. 7. Judge it on a long clock We had a client that posted for 9 months and got 150+ leads in 2 weeks off a piece of content. Most people quit right where the numbers mean the least. The whole system takes 30 to 60 minutes a week of your time once it's running. More content won't close the last mile. A system will. Lesson 2 next week: why tview source ↗
-
i've been researching these faceless 3d mannequin videos on tiktok for like a week trying to figure out why they work so well... the one i broke down is 5.7 seconds long. it's a grey mannequin in blue boxing gloves throwing a jab, cross, hook on a black background, and the counter on screen pops up with every punch so… i've been researching these faceless 3d mannequin videos on tiktok for like a week trying to figure out why they work so well... the one i broke down is 5.7 seconds long. it's a grey mannequin in blue boxing gloves throwing a jab, cross, hook on a black background, and the counter on screen pops up with every punch so you end up counting along without realizing it. by the time it loops you've watched it three times i was sure it needed a 3d animator. it doesn't.. seedance 2.5 makes the whole thing from one prompt, and honestly the hardest part was getting the character to stay identical across the cut (it kept giving him a different face until i told it he has no face at all, which is kind of funny) the part people are sleeping on is that this format isn't really about boxing. swap the gloves for your brand color and the punches for whatever your app does and you've got a content series for a fitness app, a habit tracker, a saas tool, anything. i'd bet half the faceless app pages blowing up right now are running some version of this so i turned my prompt into a template: > the exact seedance 2.5 prompt > how to swap it for fitness, yoga, productivity, and saas apps > the 10 minute capcut edit that makes it loop > how to run it as a numbered series so people binge your page RT + reply "PROMPT GUIDE" and i'll send it over...view source ↗
-
If you never let people feel the consequences of how they treat you, you become a safe house for their worst behavior. They don’t change. They just learn you’re free to disrespect. If you never let people feel the consequences of how they treat you, you become a safe house for their worst behavior. They don’t change. They just learn you’re free to disrespect.view source ↗
-
One insight from building a voice AI agent for macOS: When an AI feature returns invalid structured data, don’t show the raw error or silently guess. 1. Define the fields the next step actually needs. 2. Validate the response before saving or triggering an action. 3. If it fails, keep the user’s input and offer a ret… One insight from building a voice AI agent for macOS: When an AI feature returns invalid structured data, don’t show the raw error or silently guess. 1. Define the fields the next step actually needs. 2. Validate the response before saving or triggering an action. 3. If it fails, keep the user’s input and offer a retry or edit. A malformed optional field shouldn’t block a useful draft. Small UX detail. Big difference.view source ↗
-
Vaibhav Sooryavanshi trying to cross India Gate in Delhi 😭 and then casually started playing with Abhishek Sharma’s hair 😭😂 A kid for a reason — not just because of his age, but because of these little funny moments. 😂🫶🏻 https://t.co/Nh62jPNrFZ Vaibhav Sooryavanshi trying to cross India Gate in Delhi 😭 and then casually started playing with Abhishek Sharma’s hair 😭😂 A kid for a reason — not just because of his age, but because of these little funny moments. 😂🫶🏻 https://t.co/Nh62jPNrFZview source ↗
-
We didn't want to hand you an API and wish you luck. So for the PayPal AI Hackathon, we brought in some help. Postman, Zapier, Elastic, APIMatic, AG Grid, Bryntum, Channel3, Render, Astropods, Kernel All of it optional. Use what helps your project. Six weeks, starting October 1st. Build anything you want, … We didn't want to hand you an API and wish you luck. So for the PayPal AI Hackathon, we brought in some help. Postman, Zapier, Elastic, APIMatic, AG Grid, Bryntum, Channel3, Render, Astropods, Kernel All of it optional. Use what helps your project. Six weeks, starting October 1st. Build anything you want, as long as it uses PayPal and AI. No tracks. No problem statement. Win part of $60,000+ in prizes. Submissions closes November 12th. DevPost link below... 👇view source ↗
-
Builder Arc - Learning's sharing time I launched lafda dot fun at 12:45 PM IST, and it's been roughly 3 hours (currently writing post). > I got 51 sign-ups, > 4.4k visits, > 800+ unique visitors, > average session duration 2 minutes, > 0 premium users so far (excluding me, of course). > 6 Lafda submission out of 4 ar… Builder Arc - Learning's sharing time I launched lafda dot fun at 12:45 PM IST, and it's been roughly 3 hours (currently writing post). > I got 51 sign-ups, > 4.4k visits, > 800+ unique visitors, > average session duration 2 minutes, > 0 premium users so far (excluding me, of course). > 6 Lafda submission out of 4 are live Now let's talk about bugs and glitches. From logging and observability, I caught: > 7 frontend-side hydration errors > 2 backend logging issues From user reporting: > Fixed one footer overlap with the post bug on some devices > Another one is still in process to reproduce where the video is not playing in Edge browser and going into fullscreen. I will report back with the analytics, issues, and monetization details.view source ↗
-
This is f*cking insane. I spent thousands of dollars before I split this across three models. Run Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, and Fable 5.1 together, so Opus stops doing work it was never built to do: Sonnet handles three roles, reading, editing and testing, researching, and Fable watches the session from outside, silent un… This is f*cking insane. I spent thousands of dollars before I split this across three models. Run Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, and Fable 5.1 together, so Opus stops doing work it was never built to do: Sonnet handles three roles, reading, editing and testing, researching, and Fable watches the session from outside, silent until one of three moments hits. where Fable actually steps in: → right before a plan goes live: is this genuinely the right move? → the exact same error shows up a second time: is the search going nowhere? → a long task gets closed out: did something get missed? a layer under that, Jev engineering catches the smaller forks: which file to touch, which tool to run, push forward or stop. none of that calls for real reasoning, so none of it belongs on a model priced for real reasoning. if one model is still answering every single decision in your session, you're spending Opus-level money to confirm a file is actually there. the exact setup, paste this straight into Claude Code: "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this structure: Look through ~/.claude/agents and .claude/agents for subagents already covering explorer, worker, and researcher. Only create new ones for roles that are missing. Set model: sonnet, effort: medium on each. If an existing subagent is locked to a different model, leave it as is and just list it. In ~/.claude/settings.json, set effortLevel to high and advisorModel to fable. Check for anything disabling the advisor, CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_ADVISOR_TOOL, DISABLE_TELEMETRY, or anything blocking feature-flag fetches, plus CLAUDE_CODE_EFFORT_LEVEL, which can override subagent effort settings. Report what you find. Don't change any of it yet. Add one line to ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md: check in with the advisor before a big plan, when the same error shows up twice, and before marking a long task done. Show every change as a diff first. Wait for my go-ahead before touching anything." https://t.co/xpEE0hFQ6dview source ↗
-
I'm once again begging people to actually think about things and use common sense (or just google people before mailing them, that also would have worked) Cybersec Protip: when clawd tells you there is a vulnerability, put your bad guy hat on and think about how you could use it against someone else; if you can't, it … I'm once again begging people to actually think about things and use common sense (or just google people before mailing them, that also would have worked) Cybersec Protip: when clawd tells you there is a vulnerability, put your bad guy hat on and think about how you could use it against someone else; if you can't, it isn't oneview source ↗
-
Hey @dodopayments, I’m in a bit of a weird situation. I remember verifying my business on Dodo a couple of months ago, but I never actually launched it. I now need to update the business details because I’m operating under a different business entity, and I have the required documents. My GST number is also currently… Hey @dodopayments, I’m in a bit of a weird situation. I remember verifying my business on Dodo a couple of months ago, but I never actually launched it. I now need to update the business details because I’m operating under a different business entity, and I have the required documents. My GST number is also currently in progress. Could you help me migrate/update the business verification without affecting any existing or live payment setup? I have not submitted the bank verification yet. It is still in draft because I wanted to resolve the business verification issue first. The problem is that the dashboard currently only allows me to upload documents. All the other business details/fields appear to be locked, so I cannot update them myself. What should I do in this case? Should I upload the new business documents there, or do you need to reset/reopen the verification from your side? I want to make sure I do this correctly without causing any issues with payments.view source ↗
-
This was even worse than Sambhav Jain's tragedy 🥲 > Rahul Balyan, a Noida gym trainer who had two gyms > A newly married doctor joined his gym > She was happily married and her husband was also earning well > After she started coming to the gym, things apparently changed. The trainer started giving almost all his time… This was even worse than Sambhav Jain's tragedy 🥲 > Rahul Balyan, a Noida gym trainer who had two gyms > A newly married doctor joined his gym > She was happily married and her husband was also earning well > After she started coming to the gym, things apparently changed. The trainer started giving almost all his time to her > They would spend hours together, giggling and hanging around in the gym. This continued for months > Then she suddenly stopped coming for a few weeks. Later, people came to know that her husband had allegedly found the trainer and his wife together in an intimate situation in his own room > He went to court and filed for divorce > This woman had no regret and as she was unhappy with her sex life with her husband. She continued spending time with the trainer > Even after the husband presented evidence of adultery, he still had to pay alimony > The woman was a well earning doctor herself, yet the husband had to pay her maintenance just because he was earning more > He tried to start a new life, but that bully trainer allegedly kept sending pictures of him enjoying life with the doctor through different numbers, just to hurt him > Alimony and everything that followed apparently broke him down. Eventually, he ended his life > The trainer and the doctor moved on with their lives > His parents have filed a case in court which is still pending This is not about men vs women. Men cheat too. But even when a wife cheats, it's the husband who has to pay for her sins because adultery isn't a crime now 🤡🙏view source ↗
-
I just want my manager not to see this. (He will😭) I just want my manager not to see this. (He will😭)view source ↗
-
The feeling of not trying is 100x worse than the feeling of rejection. The feeling of not trying is 100x worse than the feeling of rejection.view source ↗
-
The grind is ugly when it is unpaid. Later, people call it discipline. The grind is ugly when it is unpaid. Later, people call it discipline.view source ↗