•twitter19436
XX / Twitter166
◈Bluesky60
YHacker News58
r/Reddit11
@Mastodon6
project rollup
Default
19737
mentions
across 19 keywords
across 19 keywords
net sentiment
+23%
6088 positive
12170 neutral
1479 negative
volume & sentiment over time
May 13 – Oct 18, 2026 · 4-day buckets
sources
most discussed
claude / pricing
active days
72
mentions
Showing 10901–10925 of 19436 mentions
-
We’re expanding our Cyber Verification Program to give security professionals broader access to our most capable models. Through this program, verified security professionals can access Claude Mythos 5.1, Opus 5.5, and Sonnet 5.5 with safeguards designed for defensive work. We’re also opening up new tiers to allow fo… We’re expanding our Cyber Verification Program to give security professionals broader access to our most capable models. Through this program, verified security professionals can access Claude Mythos 5.1, Opus 5.5, and Sonnet 5.5 with safeguards designed for defensive work. We’re also opening up new tiers to allow for authorized offensive work, like penetration testing and red-teaming. https://t.co/blaJtvxhJhview source ↗
-
Here are a few ways to repackage knowledge and skills into something that generates high income and long-term revenue. Read more: https://t.co/rtPS6jy4Xr 📷: CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images https://t.co/8R8EeupTEv Here are a few ways to repackage knowledge and skills into something that generates high income and long-term revenue. Read more: https://t.co/rtPS6jy4Xr 📷: CFOTO/Future Publishing via Getty Images https://t.co/8R8EeupTEvview source ↗
-
Built this entire Dashboard with Sonnet 5.5 the day it launched. Exact prompt below 👇 https://t.co/F80S2pix27 Built this entire Dashboard with Sonnet 5.5 the day it launched. Exact prompt below 👇 https://t.co/F80S2pix27view source ↗
-
The Claude Code team just published a 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗹𝗱 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗲 to cloud sessions. You can ask Opus 5.5 to use it to pick out everything in your project that can run in the cloud. Existing individual Pro and Max subscribers can also claim a one-time cloud credit ($𝟭𝟬𝟬 𝗼𝗻 𝗣𝗿𝗼, $𝟮𝟱𝟬 𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝗮𝘅): run /claim-credit in Claude Code by O… The Claude Code team just published a 𝗳𝘂𝗹𝗹 𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗹𝗱 𝗴𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗲 to cloud sessions. You can ask Opus 5.5 to use it to pick out everything in your project that can run in the cloud. Existing individual Pro and Max subscribers can also claim a one-time cloud credit ($𝟭𝟬𝟬 𝗼𝗻 𝗣𝗿𝗼, $𝟮𝟱𝟬 𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝗮𝘅): run /claim-credit in Claude Code by October 7. It expires November 4. Cloud sessions give every task a fresh virtual machine, and they keep going when you close your laptop. There's no separate charge for the machine, it draws on your plan's usual limits, and it doesn't tie up your laptop's CPU, so you can run tests without holding back: in the guide, a test that failed now and then was fixed and then run 𝟰𝟬 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝗿𝗼𝘄 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘇𝗲𝗿𝗼 𝗳𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘂𝗿𝗲𝘀. Small unrelated fixes, and fixes you can only prove by running tests over and over, go to the cloud. Anything that needs a local database, a VPN, a GPU or a phone simulator stays local. Send this prompt to Opus 5.5 👇 "Read this guide: https://t.co/xTRZ3KHtV8 Then look for work in this project's TODOs, failing or flaky tests (check CI history and skip markers; don't rerun them locally over and over), places where the docs and code disagree, and recent commits, and sort it into three groups: 1. Work that suits cloud sessions running in parallel, 5 items at most: unrelated tasks that can each be proven done on their own. Write each as one ready-to-use claude --cloud "…" line that says what's wrong, what done looks like, and how to prove it (make the proof heavy, for example run the full test suite 30 times in a row). Keep the items from editing the same files where you can, and give a merge order. 2. Work that has to stay local: anything that needs a local database, a VPN, a GPU or a phone simulator, or where I want to see each change in my own browser right away. 3. Things a cloud session would be missing: CLAUDE.md, skills and agents this project uses that live only in ~/.claude; changes that aren't committed or pushed; variables the tests need thview source ↗
-
If you're observant enough, people usually tell on themselves. If you're observant enough, people usually tell on themselves.view source ↗
-
BYOS Our internal agent can charge for tokens at cost and bill it along with server costs, but... you can also always bring your own subscription over and just use your own limits. BYOS Our internal agent can charge for tokens at cost and bill it along with server costs, but... you can also always bring your own subscription over and just use your own limits.view source ↗
-
🫶🏻 🫶🏻view source ↗
-
Try asking your Grok Bot to send an email It'll claim an inbox — name@mail.grokbot.com Your bot now has an email to use. It can send and receive emails https://t.co/wGYSVKfnfD Try asking your Grok Bot to send an email It'll claim an inbox — name@mail.grokbot.com Your bot now has an email to use. It can send and receive emails https://t.co/wGYSVKfnfDview source ↗
-
The cleanest way to stay current without trend-chasing: Track behavior, not vocabulary. What are buyers doing differently? What work moved from person to agent? What new risk entered the decision? What old advantage became free? Trends fade. Changed behavior rewrites strategy. The cleanest way to stay current without trend-chasing: Track behavior, not vocabulary. What are buyers doing differently? What work moved from person to agent? What new risk entered the decision? What old advantage became free? Trends fade. Changed behavior rewrites strategy.view source ↗
-
It’s me 🫶🏻🥹😅 It’s me 🫶🏻🥹😅view source ↗
-
7 days ago I had 1 follower. If you are in tech lets connect!! https://t.co/y7lH7vtEyI 7 days ago I had 1 follower. If you are in tech lets connect!! https://t.co/y7lH7vtEyIview source ↗
-
I used to think better arguments changed minds. Then I realized some people aren't looking for the truth. They're protecting a conclusion. I used to think better arguments changed minds. Then I realized some people aren't looking for the truth. They're protecting a conclusion.view source ↗
-
T 5877 - clearing the dust T 5877 - clearing the dustview source ↗
-
Most people don't need more information. They need to stop negotiating with themselves. At some point, thinking becomes another form of procrastination. Make the decision. Let action correct the rest. Most people don't need more information. They need to stop negotiating with themselves. At some point, thinking becomes another form of procrastination. Make the decision. Let action correct the rest.view source ↗
-
May every day include a kind word, a good laugh and a moment you'll treasure forever. May every day include a kind word, a good laugh and a moment you'll treasure forever.view source ↗
-
Tesseract killed the handoff problem!! Tesseract killed the handoff problem!!view source ↗
-
This is crime against API design. https://t.co/CVipqNrVP0 This is crime against API design. https://t.co/CVipqNrVP0view source ↗
-
The kind of life I want for myself. https://t.co/44CHxvwbG2 The kind of life I want for myself. https://t.co/44CHxvwbG2view source ↗
-
If you think AI film can’t be art then explain this. https://t.co/uivxDdgSDs If you think AI film can’t be art then explain this. https://t.co/uivxDdgSDsview source ↗
-
how I made $229,000 last month spamming people with cold emails at 24 years old https://t.co/efVm8gM3qm how I made $229,000 last month spamming people with cold emails at 24 years old https://t.co/efVm8gM3qmview source ↗
-
@unlikelyoscar @opencode @OpenCodeJr what opencode 2 blog post.... @unlikelyoscar @opencode @OpenCodeJr what opencode 2 blog post....view source ↗
-
custom fields are the REAL boss!! custom fields are the REAL boss!!view source ↗
-
we've mostly gotten past the slop issue in this new world of working together with AI the next problem is people keep accidentally undoing functionality this is happening because everyone is more in everyone else's business. hit an issue? fix it right away without nagging anyone the problem is it's unclear how inten… we've mostly gotten past the slop issue in this new world of working together with AI the next problem is people keep accidentally undoing functionality this is happening because everyone is more in everyone else's business. hit an issue? fix it right away without nagging anyone the problem is it's unclear how intentional the current behavior is and what absolutely should not be rolled back you can say tests should be this. but they don't capture the fact that you discarded seemingly valid solutions 1-4 and settled on 5. someone later (an agent) might thing "oh 3 is simpler" any additional document also doesn't feel like it solves the problem because it's yet another thing that can drift where is the source of truth for how your software is supposed to work?view source ↗
-
Read the full piece: https://t.co/UePt0EuZiI Read the full piece: https://t.co/UePt0EuZiIview source ↗
-
𝗖𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀: Personal agents don't cite their sources. Measuring how website content influences these agents’ decisions will require different metrics. 𝗖𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀: Personal agents don't cite their sources. Measuring how website content influences these agents’ decisions will require different metrics.view source ↗