project rollup
Default
16178
mentions
across 19 keywords
across 19 keywords
net sentiment
+24%
5105 positive
9895 neutral
1178 negative
volume & sentiment over time
May 13 – Oct 14, 2026 · 4-day buckets
1–8 of 8 keywords
| keyword | mentions | net | trend | top theme | srcs | last seen | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| timeline | 15877 | +63% | — | 1 | 5h | ||
| Opus 5.5 model documentation | 51 | +61% | claude / pricing | 2 | 2w | ||
| Opus 5.5 official announcement | 50 | +68% | pricing / model | 1 | 2w | ||
| SynthID | 16 | +100% | gemini / google | 1 | 2w | ||
| Cline | 149 | +72% | code | 3 | 2w | ||
| Quill | 32 | -10% | performance | 4 | 2w | ||
| Google SynthID AI image watermark discussion | 1 | +100% | — | 1 | 2mo | ||
| Opus 5.5 versus Claude Opus models | 2 | +100% | — | 1 | 3mo |
mentions
Showing 16076–16100 of 16178 mentions
-
Official announcement is here but I will wait for @thsottiaux to come and tell us just how much more Sol will last on our subscriptions. API pricing is 50% cheaper but it does not mean we will get this benefit in our subs. So I would like to get this clarification, it is not mentioned anywhere. Also, the benchmar… Official announcement is here but I will wait for @thsottiaux to come and tell us just how much more Sol will last on our subscriptions. API pricing is 50% cheaper but it does not mean we will get this benefit in our subs. So I would like to get this clarification, it is not mentioned anywhere. Also, the benchmarks do NOT hold a candle to Opus 5.5 as we predicted. I am more excited for how much more usage we get. If this doesn't feel near unlimited in 20x Sub, they ain't giving us the full benefit.view source ↗
-
looks like gpt-sol 6 might be dropping today alongside opus 5.5 API pricing is apparently 2x cheaper than gpt-sol 5.6 waiting for the official announcement and benchmarks https://t.co/lq2qLX9fAj looks like gpt-sol 6 might be dropping today alongside opus 5.5 API pricing is apparently 2x cheaper than gpt-sol 5.6 waiting for the official announcement and benchmarks https://t.co/lq2qLX9fAjview source ↗
-
Both GPT-6 Sol & GPT-6 Luna are 50% cheaper than their predecessors. This means a few things > Sorry who gives a shit about Grok 4.7? > They are not better than Opus 5.5, but much cheaper and efficient > Luna being even cheaper mogs open weight models > Astra's pricing makes even less sense if Sol is almost as good… Both GPT-6 Sol & GPT-6 Luna are 50% cheaper than their predecessors. This means a few things > Sorry who gives a shit about Grok 4.7? > They are not better than Opus 5.5, but much cheaper and efficient > Luna being even cheaper mogs open weight models > Astra's pricing makes even less sense if Sol is almost as good But wow they want to maintain their efficiency and cost frontier. Let's see how this reflects in our subscriptions. Waiting for official announcement and benches!view source ↗
-
@TokenGremlin Fast rollout before the official announcement is wild Curious if Opus 5.5 forced their hand that hard @TokenGremlin Fast rollout before the official announcement is wild Curious if Opus 5.5 forced their hand that hardview source ↗
-
GPT-6 Sol and Luna are here! The rollout was EXTREMELY FAST, even before the official announcement. Congrats to OpenAI for how quickly they responded to Opus 5.5. Now all that’s left is to wait for the official announcement. https://t.co/PSHrdYXbGy GPT-6 Sol and Luna are here! The rollout was EXTREMELY FAST, even before the official announcement. Congrats to OpenAI for how quickly they responded to Opus 5.5. Now all that’s left is to wait for the official announcement. https://t.co/PSHrdYXbGyview source ↗
-
🚨 WAIT... OPENAI'S TUESDAY MIGHT ACTUALLY BE HAPPENING People are starting to see GPT-6 LUNA inside Codex backend responses. Requests to GPT-5.6 Luna are reportedly coming back as: gpt-6-luna and there are similar signs around GPT-6 Sol too. This is especially funny because Anthropic JUST dropped Opus 5.5 today 😭 … 🚨 WAIT... OPENAI'S TUESDAY MIGHT ACTUALLY BE HAPPENING People are starting to see GPT-6 LUNA inside Codex backend responses. Requests to GPT-5.6 Luna are reportedly coming back as: gpt-6-luna and there are similar signs around GPT-6 Sol too. This is especially funny because Anthropic JUST dropped Opus 5.5 today 😭 Anthropic really tried to hijack OpenAI's Tuesday and OpenAI said hold on... No official announcement yet. But GPT-6 Sol + Luna appearing in Codex is a pretty big sign that something is moving behind the scenes. I'm watching this one closely 👀view source ↗
-
The official announcement. Opus 5.5 is here and it delivers Fable 5.1 performance at a cost 40% cheaper than even Opus 5. > They've lowered the API pricing since this model takes far less compute to run. > It is also 30% faster to run than Opus 5. > It talks naturally, finally fixing Opus 5's language problem BA… The official announcement. Opus 5.5 is here and it delivers Fable 5.1 performance at a cost 40% cheaper than even Opus 5. > They've lowered the API pricing since this model takes far less compute to run. > It is also 30% faster to run than Opus 5. > It talks naturally, finally fixing Opus 5's language problem BAD NEWS THO: Since this model shows similar bio & cyber capabilities, it has the same guardrails that Fable does. Overall, what a banger release. I am pumped to test it out.view source ↗
-
Quill's search is instant and the UI is gorgeous. Worth trying if you take a lot of notes. Quill's search is instant and the UI is gorgeous. Worth trying if you take a lot of notes.view source ↗
-
🚨 CLAUDE OPUS 5.5 COULD DROP TODAY? Anthropic might be preparing a surprise release — but there’s a catch 👀 > Multiple reports are pointing to a possible September 22 launch > The rumored internal codename is `claude-wafer-eap` > A possible model ID being circulated is `claude-opus-5-5` > Rumored API pricing: $4 inpu… 🚨 CLAUDE OPUS 5.5 COULD DROP TODAY? Anthropic might be preparing a surprise release — but there’s a catch 👀 > Multiple reports are pointing to a possible September 22 launch > The rumored internal codename is `claude-wafer-eap` > A possible model ID being circulated is `claude-opus-5-5` > Rumored API pricing: $4 input / $20 output per 1M tokens > That would be ~20% cheaper than the current Opus 5 > Reports claim major improvements in coding + long-running agentic tasks > Some reports suggest Anthropic could skip the 5.2 naming entirely > Opus 5 currently costs $5 input / $25 output per 1M tokens > Opus 5 already supports a 1M-token context window But here's the important part: Anthropic has NOT officially announced Claude Opus 5.5. Its official model lineup still lists Opus 5 as the current Opus model, and there is no official Opus 5.5 model ID, pricing page, benchmark or release announcement yet. 0 The Opus 5.5 claims are currently coming from leaks, X posts and community reports. So today could be a huge Anthropic day… OR this could end up being another AI rumor that doesn't materialize. 👀 If Anthropic actually drops Opus 5.5 with the rumored $4/$20 pricing + serious coding improvements… developers are going to pay VERY close attention. 🔥 Opus 5.5 today? We’ll see. 👀 Everything beyond Anthropic's official announcements remains unconfirmed.view source ↗
-
Claude Opus 5.5 just popped up in Hookami — before an official Anthropic announcement. 8 videos. 8 channels. The signal is already moving. You can make the video while everyone else is waiting for the press release. That’s Hookami. https://t.co/dAWiDQDjIp Claude Opus 5.5 just popped up in Hookami — before an official Anthropic announcement. 8 videos. 8 channels. The signal is already moving. You can make the video while everyone else is waiting for the press release. That’s Hookami. https://t.co/dAWiDQDjIpview source ↗
-
Still just a leak, not an Anthropic announcement. Official lineup is still Fable 5.1 and Opus 5. If 5.5 actually ships at Fable-level quality and half the price, that would be the useful model. Watching. Still just a leak, not an Anthropic announcement. Official lineup is still Fable 5.1 and Opus 5. If 5.5 actually ships at Fable-level quality and half the price, that would be the useful model. Watching.view source ↗
-
@bridgemindai Still just a leak, not an Anthropic announcement. Official lineup is still Fable 5.1 and Opus 5. If 5.5 actually ships at Fable-level quality and half the price, that would be the useful model. Watching. @bridgemindai Still just a leak, not an Anthropic announcement. Official lineup is still Fable 5.1 and Opus 5. If 5.5 actually ships at Fable-level quality and half the price, that would be the useful model. Watching.view source ↗
-
Alibaba's Pingtouge just stood on stage and pounded its chest! Saying the quiet part out loud: it wants the model, the chip, the datacenter and the agent stack. All of it. Welcome back to Tuesday! And Qwen 4 is official! er, well, in training. Alibaba also laid out the roadmap: Qwen 4.5 and Qwen 5 are projected to s… Alibaba's Pingtouge just stood on stage and pounded its chest! Saying the quiet part out loud: it wants the model, the chip, the datacenter and the agent stack. All of it. Welcome back to Tuesday! And Qwen 4 is official! er, well, in training. Alibaba also laid out the roadmap: Qwen 4.5 and Qwen 5 are projected to scale into the 5–10 trillion parameter range, versus 2.4T for today’s Qwen3.8-Max. Careful reading X rumors, because some early headlines are already turning “future Qwen models up to 10T” into “Qwen 4 is a 10T model.” Alibaba did not say that. And being of sound mind, I thought, how the heck do you run that in China without Nvidia? Well, there's more. Its T-Head chip group unveiled Zhenwu V900, a training-and-inference accelerator that Alibaba says delivers 3× the performance of May’s M890, carries 216GB of memory, provides 1.2TB/s chip-to-chip bandwidth, and natively supports FP8 and FP4. The new Panjiu systems built around it are supposed to enter commercial production in Q1 2027, with Alibaba saying the architecture can ultimately scale a single cluster to as many as 500,000 cards which is obviously more than a few. Wow! Are you sure? The number looks ridiculous enough to make the 10T-model talk look considerably less theoretical. Yet, there it is. But Alibaba has history. Its current M890 supernodes run Qwen3.8-Max and Kimi K3, both above two trillion parameters, while the company says the Zhenwu family is already serving more than 650 enterprise customers. At the infrastructure level, Alibaba targets global cloud datacenter capacity above 20GW by 2032. Not exactly a startup putting “10T parameters” into a roadmap deck and hoping somebody finds GPUs later. Alibaba is trying to vertically integrate the entire thing. I'm curious how the two new Brazilian data centers announced in August will fit into these build outs, and chip plans. And file under just one more thing.... Buried underneath the giant-model headline Alibaba says Qwen3.8-Max hasview source ↗
-
Wish Quill were open source. Great app but I don't trust a closed notes app with my second brain. Wish Quill were open source. Great app but I don't trust a closed notes app with my second brain.view source ↗
-
The Quill sync bug bit me again. Lost edits after switching devices. Be careful. The Quill sync bug bit me again. Lost edits after switching devices. Be careful.view source ↗
-
Quill's docs are seriously lacking. Spent an hour figuring out how templates work. Quill's docs are seriously lacking. Spent an hour figuring out how templates work.view source ↗
-
Honestly Quill is just okay. Does the job but nothing groundbreaking. The docs are thin. Honestly Quill is just okay. Does the job but nothing groundbreaking. The docs are thin.view source ↗
-
We rolled Quill out to the whole team. Setup was painful and the docs are missing half the features. We rolled Quill out to the whole team. Setup was painful and the docs are missing half the features.view source ↗
-
AX – Google’s Open Agentic OrchestratorI have been happy with Google's Antigravity harness and Jules so looking forward to playing with this. Thanks for sharing. Simultaneously I am looking to also revisit local offline models. While I feel like I have a decent understanding of the model landscape I'm feeling a bit lost at which agentic harness to leverage … I have been happy with Google's Antigravity harness and Jules so looking forward to playing with this. Thanks for sharing. Simultaneously I am looking to also revisit local offline models. While I feel like I have a decent understanding of the model landscape I'm feeling a bit lost at which agentic harness to leverage for local models. Hermes, Cline, Aider, Qwen Code, Goose, Pi, OpenCode, something else? I live in the terminal so Desktop UX is a bonus but not a must have. Can I modify the antigravity settings/program to point to a local model? Where should I spend my energy?view source ↗
-
Quill is closed source and that's a dealbreaker for me. Looking for an open alternative. Quill is closed source and that's a dealbreaker for me. Looking for an open alternative.view source ↗
-
The pricing model killed it for me. $12/mo for notes I could keep in plain markdown? No thanks. The pricing model killed it for me. $12/mo for notes I could keep in plain markdown? No thanks.view source ↗
-
Love that Quill is local-first and doesn't phone home. No telemetry, no account required to start. Love that Quill is local-first and doesn't phone home. No telemetry, no account required to start.view source ↗
-
Quill crashed three times today on a large vault. Performance falls apart past 10k notes. Quill crashed three times today on a large vault. Performance falls apart past 10k notes.view source ↗
-
Quill pricing is too high$12/mo is ridiculous when Obsidian is free. The app is nice but not that nice. $12/mo is ridiculous when Obsidian is free. The app is nice but not that nice.view source ↗
-
Quill's keyboard shortcuts are fantastic. Feels like it was built by people who actually take notes. Quill's keyboard shortcuts are fantastic. Feels like it was built by people who actually take notes.view source ↗