Partial day — headline is the last complete day (2026-10-13).
twitter
tracked since 2026-10-03T06:40:25.575928+00:00
conclusion
Measured mentions per day
day (UTC)
mentions
2026-09-27
0
2026-09-28
0
2026-09-29
0
2026-09-30
0
2026-10-01
11
2026-10-02
17
2026-10-03
8
2026-10-04
14
2026-10-05
44
2026-10-06
28
2026-10-07
8
2026-10-08
0
2026-10-09
6
2026-10-10
2
2026-10-11
5
2026-10-12
6
2026-10-13
7
2026-10-14
1
derived from
solgpt-6.1 sol
word-boundary match over title + text, query='timeline' · window
2026-09-27 → 2026-10-15
· 157 matching posts
evidenceShowing 20 newest of 157
•
twitterYoussefRabeiii6hpositive
the perfect ai usage page doesnt exit....
@t3dotcodes
it had like 2 bugs to make multi account work but literally i fixed them with @OpenAI 6.1 Sol in like 5 mins for t3 code INSIDE t3 code ✨
AMAZINGGGGG Work @jullerino @theo and everyone on the team
now i cant go back 🔥 https://t.co/twAprqtfZzthe perfect ai usage page doesnt exit....
@t3dotcodes
it had like 2 bugs to make multi account work but literally i fixed them with @OpenAI 6.1 Sol in like 5 mins for t3 code INSIDE t3 code ✨
AMAZINGGGGG Work @jullerino @theo and everyone on the team
now i cant go back 🔥 https://t.co/twAprqtfZz
Sol Max - 33 TPS
Sol Fast - 36 TPS
I love OpenAI and I still believe in this but this is just unusable.Sol Max - 33 TPS
Sol Fast - 36 TPS
I love OpenAI and I still believe in this but this is just unusable.
Muse Wonder & Wonder FULL by @AIatMeta on KingBench 4
Ranking:
Opus 5.5 — 57.8%
GPT-6 Astra — 56.5%
GPT-6.1 Sol — 55.0%
Haiku 5.5 — 54.2%
Muse Wonder Full 1.0 — 53.0%
Muse Wonder 1.0 and GLM-5.3 — 45.8% each, tied
The models is not Opus 5.5 Level and is not token efficient at all. There are more downsides to the mode…Muse Wonder & Wonder FULL by @AIatMeta on KingBench 4
Ranking:
Opus 5.5 — 57.8%
GPT-6 Astra — 56.5%
GPT-6.1 Sol — 55.0%
Haiku 5.5 — 54.2%
Muse Wonder Full 1.0 — 53.0%
Muse Wonder 1.0 and GLM-5.3 — 45.8% each, tied
The models is not Opus 5.5 Level and is not token efficient at all. There are more downsides to the model than there are upsides.
GPT-6.1 Sol still remains the king at being token efficient.
Sol costs about $1 per task,
Haiku costs about $1.23 per task,
Wonder costs about $1.75 per task.
Wonder Full costs about $2.87 per task
Astra costs $6.6 and Opus 5.5 - $7.5
This price could have been very justified if the performance was on level with Opus or Astra but it is below Sol and Haiku. Wonder is on GLM-5.3 level while Wonderfull is short of Sol & Haiku.
Wonder is really bad at complex prompts, developing fully featured apps unattended.
The bench for context tests for 6 prompts that involve building a docker clone (VM), GBA, DS Emulation, Room Desigining Software, Pokemon Red reconstruction, QMK/VIA Compatible Keyboard Configurator and so on. The model is not acing any of these tests. The full test results will be available on the YT Video: https://t.co/Z1XMPnAbIL
I find Muse SO much more readable. Here are the outputs
1st is Muse
2nd is Opus
3rd is Sol https://t.co/2qiqnSXEF7I find Muse SO much more readable. Here are the outputs
1st is Muse
2nd is Opus
3rd is Sol https://t.co/2qiqnSXEF7
Asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol, and Muse Wonder Full to fix a bug
Opus found the root cause and filed a pr
GPT-6.1 Sol asked a question, crashed from the async question tool interrupt, found the bug, fixed it, wrote 300 lines of tests, and explained it in impossible to understand terms.
Muse Wonder Full found a small P…Asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol, and Muse Wonder Full to fix a bug
Opus found the root cause and filed a pr
GPT-6.1 Sol asked a question, crashed from the async question tool interrupt, found the bug, fixed it, wrote 300 lines of tests, and explained it in impossible to understand terms.
Muse Wonder Full found a small PR someone else had filed and said "you should probably merge this instead"
I really like this model.
The gap is so weird. They both are nearly identical in token efficiency, but behave so different.
"Full" scores equivalent to Opus xhigh with fewer tokens on AA.
Non-full scores below GPT-6.1 Sol with same token usage as "Full" (higher than Sol) https://t.co/tzCjpFiSJFThe gap is so weird. They both are nearly identical in token efficiency, but behave so different.
"Full" scores equivalent to Opus xhigh with fewer tokens on AA.
Non-full scores below GPT-6.1 Sol with same token usage as "Full" (higher than Sol) https://t.co/tzCjpFiSJF
6.1 Sol ultrafast >>> 6 Astra
~ same cost but whole different game with 250 tpm6.1 Sol ultrafast >>> 6 Astra
~ same cost but whole different game with 250 tpm
My current model rankings
S - Opus 5.5, Muse Wonder
A - GPT-6.1 Sol
— Gap —
Everything elseMy current model rankings
S - Opus 5.5, Muse Wonder
A - GPT-6.1 Sol
— Gap —
Everything else
THIS IS F**KING ADDICTIVE
GROK TURNED COPY TRADING ON FOMO INTO A MONEY PRINTER BY PICKING WHO TO FOLLOW EVERY HOUR.
12 HOURS, 82% WIN RATE, $100 TO $1,342.
Copy trading has a dirty secret. DWF Ventures tracked 292,000 fomo wallets over three months. Only 6.16% ended in profit.
The problem isn’t copying. It’s who y…THIS IS F**KING ADDICTIVE
GROK TURNED COPY TRADING ON FOMO INTO A MONEY PRINTER BY PICKING WHO TO FOLLOW EVERY HOUR.
12 HOURS, 82% WIN RATE, $100 TO $1,342.
Copy trading has a dirty secret. DWF Ventures tracked 292,000 fomo wallets over three months. Only 6.16% ended in profit.
The problem isn’t copying. It’s who you copy and for how long.
So I stopped picking. At 8 AM Grok took a trader from the weekly top and my phone started buzzing.
The first hours were small. $GLORP +$4.10. $NUBBY +$6.02. One loss for -$1.40. When that trader tried to size in too big, the trade was skipped.
Then he took 2 losses in a row. Grok dropped him before lunch and moved to the weekly #3, a 79% win rate.
That switch made the day. $96.30 on one exit. $162.80 on another, after the trader put 412 SOL into a coin and Grok followed with 2.1. $204.55 on the last big win before close.
Every exit fired within half a second of the trader selling. Grok picked, copyfomo executed, I watched the lock screen.
copyfomo: https://t.co/a09rFo82sx
10:20 AM: $206. Noon: $359. 4 PM: $802. 8 PM: $1,342.
76 wins. 17 losses. 13.4x in one working day.
One day isn’t three months. But it shows where the edge sits: not in copying, in deciding who to drop.
The full setup is below and free. Hardly anyone has saved it. Save it before your next copy trade.
Quick clarifications:
1. I excluded ts-rust since it's a super long running YOLO mission, not actual day to day usage
2. Ran against Opus on my $200 plan as well, attached below
3. This isn't just my Sol numbers, the 583/week is my total usage
The 2nd run I just did found more prompts overall, but the "missing ones" w…Quick clarifications:
1. I excluded ts-rust since it's a super long running YOLO mission, not actual day to day usage
2. Ran against Opus on my $200 plan as well, attached below
3. This isn't just my Sol numbers, the 583/week is my total usage
The 2nd run I just did found more prompts overall, but the "missing ones" were mostly noise (from broken PR monitors)
Turns out I can probably main GPT-6.1 Sol Ultrafast on the $500 plan and just barely hit my limits
Maybe not such a bad deal after all? https://t.co/cr2jld8QPHTurns out I can probably main GPT-6.1 Sol Ultrafast on the $500 plan and just barely hit my limits
Maybe not such a bad deal after all? https://t.co/cr2jld8QPH
PUMP OR DUMP, MY GROK BOT DOESN’T CARE. $54 → $5,874 IN 22 HOURS
The biggest take of the run was a short. The second biggest was a long.
Most people decide in the morning whether they’re bullish or bearish, then spend the day defending it. My bot doesn’t have a side to defend. Market sliding, it shorts. Market bounci…PUMP OR DUMP, MY GROK BOT DOESN’T CARE. $54 → $5,874 IN 22 HOURS
The biggest take of the run was a short. The second biggest was a long.
Most people decide in the morning whether they’re bullish or bearish, then spend the day defending it. My bot doesn’t have a side to defend. Market sliding, it shorts. Market bouncing, it longs.
I asked Grok to build a perps bot for BTC, ETH, SOL, AVAX and SUI, one that trades both ways and never holds a position on feelings. This is the logic it came back with:
- Every entry has its take-profit calculated before it opens, no “let’s see where it goes”
- Picks the side off the move: dump means short, bounce means long
- Sizes off the current balance, not the starting deposit
- Matches leverage to the coin and to the distance to target
- Cuts a loser fast and never averages down
That second rule is the whole personality of the thing. A red hour and a green hour are both just setups.
The five big takes split three shorts, two longs. The SOL short paid the most, $1,617, and the BTC long came next with $677. Every one of them cleared 100% on margin.
What keeps it alive is the ratio. The average win was about 4% of the balance, the average loss about 0.8%. Five to one. 181 trades, 36 of them red, and on the equity curve you can barely find the dips.
The small trades actually out-earned the big takes, $3,143 to $2,677.
The leverage here is my own desk’s sizing, not a signal. Don’t copy it.
Hour 22. $5,874 on the account, and the bot still has no opinion on where the market goes next. It just needs it to go somewhere.
Este tipo explica cómo crear páginas web profesionales con GPT-5.6 Sol.
Un tutorial de 21 minutos donde explica paso a paso cómo construir diseños con un acabado cinematográfico.
🔖 Guárdalo. Vale cada minuto. https://t.co/EHDRr0m69dEste tipo explica cómo crear páginas web profesionales con GPT-5.6 Sol.
Un tutorial de 21 minutos donde explica paso a paso cómo construir diseños con un acabado cinematográfico.
🔖 Guárdalo. Vale cada minuto. https://t.co/EHDRr0m69d
Guys, what AI model do you use for coming up with ideas?
I’m stuck between GPT 6.1 Sol and Claude Haiku 5.5. 🤔Guys, what AI model do you use for coming up with ideas?
I’m stuck between GPT 6.1 Sol and Claude Haiku 5.5. 🤔
I think they sped up default speeds too much on GPT-6.1 Sol. It's barely slower than "fast"
Ultrafast go brr tho https://t.co/Jc62skePjxI think they sped up default speeds too much on GPT-6.1 Sol. It's barely slower than "fast"
Ultrafast go brr tho https://t.co/Jc62skePjx
Codex users,
which one do you prefer for code reviews
- Astra
- gpt-6.1 sol
NCodex users,
which one do you prefer for code reviews
- Astra
- gpt-6.1 sol
N